Utvecklarna bakom JRiver Media Center håller på att utveckla ett alternativ till madVR som de kallar "JRVR -- JRiver Video Renderer".
Du kan läsa mer här:
JRVR WIKI
https://wiki.jriver...._Video_Renderer
JRVR - JRiver Video Renderer/Configuration
https://wiki.jriver....r/Configuration
Preview of JRVR in MC 29
https://yabb.jriver..../topicseen.html
JRVR in MC 29 (tidigare MC 28)
https://yabb.jriver....c,130657.0.html
JRVR in MC 29
https://yabb.jriver....c,131974.0.html
JRVR in MC 29 - NEW: Enhancements in JRVR Video Renderer
https://yabb.jriver....c,132317.0.html
JRVR Status, Plans and Upcoming Changes
https://yabb.jriver....c,131214.0.html
Här är vad de vill åstadkomma med JRVR:
""
JRVR is designed with a few key ideas in mind
1) Cross-Platform
A cross-platform renderer allows us to offer a consistent video experience on all supported platforms, on Windows, Linux and Mac
2) High-Quality Video
High-Quality processing and presentation of the videos is the primary goal of JRVR. Including full support for HDR and other modern video technologies.
3) Ease of Use ("It just works!")
The experience should be good out of the box, and only get better with a bit of configuration, and not require hours of research to tune hundreds of options
4) Efficiency/Scalability
Low-end machines can still play video just fine. And we want to enable them to do so in high-quality. At the same time, faster machines can use more advanced features to get even more out of the videos.
JRVR may not be a full replacement for madVR for the hard core enthusiast, but it should work very well for the typical video user. And this is our goal. A solution that offers high-quality video for everyone, at no to very little setup effort.
""
Jag har själv inte provat JRVR, då min uppsättning med JRiver och madVR fungerar bra för mig.
Jag har dock för avsikt att när MC29 släpps prova JRVR.
Är det någon av er som har provat JRVR?
Detta är vad en prominent bidragare, jmone, till utveckling av madVR skriver om JRVR:
""
- Now the more contentious is the dedicated HT setup. madVR vs JRVR. That is the question. It needs tonemapping. I've run madVR on this for years (including the development versions). Currently I'm running JRVR and I'm very happy with it and in real time viewing I see no difference. I'm not sure I particularly care about what exact shade the explosions in MadMax are, or Voldemort's energy bolts, or the tip of the spear that gets endlessly discussed in the madVR thread. I more care that the playback is smooth without dropping frames or that there is no brightness pulsing, blown highlights, crushed blacks... or other artefacts that pull you out of the story. I think this is where JRVR shines. It just works.
The extra efficiency means that you are not running on the edge all the time. It is easy to setup to get a great looking picture without needing 1,000 tweaks..... you know the ones that look great on one scene then no so good on another? I'm soooo over knob twiddling, bit polishing, and pixel peeping.... I just want to watch some movies not sit their evaluating the image.
That said, there is a strong case for madVR and its inclusion in MC. It has all sorts of flexibility and customising to suit a particular setup that I don't see JRVR ever having. If you want to squeeze the absolute best image quality out of MC, then madVR is your option.
""
Redigerat av arcspin, 10 mars 2022 - 05:29.